1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 43 F.4th
  5. 43 F.4th 1138 (2022)
 

JOHNSON v. NPAS SOLUTIONS, LLC

No. 18-12344.

43 F.4th 1138 (2022)

Charles T. JOHNSON, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, Jenna Dickenson, Interested Party-Appellant, v. NPAS SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Filed: August 3, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Davis , Law Office of John Davis, Tampa, FL, Eric Alan Isaacson , Law Office of Eric Alan Isaacson, La Jolla, CA, Charles Benjamin Nutley , C. Benjamin Nutley , Attorney at Law, Kailua Kona, HI, for Interested Party-Appellant.

Michael L. Greenwald , Greenwald Davidson Radbil, PLLC, Boca Raton, FL, Ashley Conrad Keller , Keller Postman, LLC, Chicago, IL, Warren David Postman , Keller Postman, LLC, WASHINGTON, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael L. Ehren , Martin Barry Goldberg , Alan D. Lash , Lash & Goldberg, LLP, Miami, FL, Maura K. Monaghan , Jacob W. Stahl , Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.

Jonathan D. Selbin , Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus Curiae Brian T. Fitzpatrick.

David Sidney Shaffer Nahmias , Lindsay Nako , Impact Fund, Berkeley, CA, for Amicus Curiae Impact Fund.

Ellen L. Noble , Public Justice, PC, Washington, DC, Emily Villano , Law Office of Emily Villano, University City, MO, for Amicus Curiae Public Justice, PC.

Charles N. Nauen , Lockridge Grindal Nauen, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Amicus Curiae The Committee To Support the Antitrust Laws.

Cecily Jordan , Tousley Brain Stephens, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Amicus Curiae The Main Street Alliance.

Before William Pryor, Chief Judge, Wilson, Jordan, Rosenbaum, Jill Pryor, Newsom, Branch, Grant, Luck, Lagoa, and Brasher, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted against granting rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will not be reheard en banc.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases