DANSIE v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.

No. 20-4054.

42 F.4th 1184 (2022)

Kelly DANSIE, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

FILED August 2, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam W. Hansen , Apollo Law LLC ( Nicholas D. Thompson , The Moody Law Firm, Portsmouth, Virginia, Justin L. James , James, Dodge, Russell, & Stephens, P.C., Salt Lake City, Utah, and Michael E. Bourne , Minneapolis, Minnesota, with him on the brief), Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Plaintiff-Appellant Kelly Dansie.

Christopher Hedican , Baird Holm LLP ( Michael J. Roccaforte , with him on the brief), Omaha, Nebraska, for Defendant-Appellee Union Pacific Railroad Company.

Before HARTZ, BRISCOE, and CARSON, Circuit Judges.


When an employee provides notice to his employer of a disability and expresses a desire for a reasonable accommodation, the employee and the employer must engage in good-faith communications—what we have termed the interactive process. Once an employee triggers the interactive process, both the employee and the employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases