DAY v. ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP

No. 21-16642.

42 F.4th 1131 (2022)

Jones DAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP; Michael D. Torpey; Mitchell Zuklie, Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 1, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig E. Stewart (argued), David C. Kiernan , and Paul C. Hines , Jones Day, San Francisco, California, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Sarah M. Harris (argued), Michael J. Mestitz , Benjamin W. Graham , and Aaron Z. Roper , Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, D.C.; L. Christopher Vejnoska , Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California; for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Sandra S. Ikuta, and Bridget S. Bade, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

Congress enacted Chapter Two of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), see 9 U.S.C. §§ 201-208, to provide for the effective and efficient resolution of international arbitral disputes after the United States entered into the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases