NEW YORK STATE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS & POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC. v. HOCHUL

No. 18-3151-cv.

NEW YORK STATE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS & POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC., DONN ROWE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK STATE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS & POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC., AL MOTHERSHED, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARY SITUATED, ART W. JOLLEY, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARY SITUATED, LOUIS GIAMPAGLIA, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARY SITUATED, DAVID L. FAILE, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARY SITUATED, WILLIAM J. WEST, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARY SITUATED, DIANE DAVIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KATHLEEN C. HOCHUL, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PATRICIA A. HITE, INDIVIDUALLY, REBECCA A. CORSO, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE CIVIL SERVICE DEPARTMENT, CAROLINE W. AHL, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW YORK STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, LANI V. JONES, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW YORK STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ROBERT L. MEGNA, INDIVIDUALLY, ROBERT F. MUJICA, JR., IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF THE BUDGET, THOMAS P. DINAPOLI, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 27, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LAWRENCE H. SCHAEFER , Lippes Mathias LLP, Albany, NY., for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

FREDERICK A. BRODIE , Assistant Solicitor General ( Barbara D. Underwood , Solicitor General, Andrea Oser , Deputy Solicitor General, on the brief), for Letitia James, Attorney General, State of New York, Albany, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.

PRESENT: JON O. NEWMAN, GERARD E. LYNCH,


SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases