LG ELECTRONICS INC. v. IMMERVISION, INC.

2021-2037, 2021-2038.

39 F.4th 1364 (2022)

LG ELECTRONICS INC., Appellant v. IMMERVISION, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: July 11, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julie S. Goldemberg , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Dion Michael Bregman , Alexander Stein , Palo Alto, CA; Andrew V. Devkar , Los Angeles, CA; William R. Peterson , Houston, TX.

John David Simmons , Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel, LLP, Wilmington, DE, argued for appellee. Also represented by Dennis James Butler ; Keith Aaron Jones , Stephen Emerson Murray , Philadelphia, PA.

Opinion dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge Newman.


This appeal requires us to consider how to treat a prior art reference in which the alleged teaching of a claim element would be understood by a skilled artisan not to be an actual teaching, but rather to be an obvious error of a typographical or similar nature. LG Electronics Inc. appeals from the United States Patent Trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases