1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 39 F.4th
  5. 39 F.4th 544 (2022)
 

HARTMAN v. BOWLES

No. 21-1365.

39 F.4th 544 (2022)

James HARTMAN; Ryan Hartman, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Beary BOWLES, Detective, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: July 5, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellants and appeared on appellants' brief is Hugh Athelstan Eastwood , of Saint Louis, MO. The following attorney appeared on the appellant brief; W. Bevis Schock , of Saint Louis, MO.

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee and appeared on the appellee brief was Andrew D. Wheaton , of Saint Louis, MO.

Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

Does a detective violate a clearly established constitutional right by omitting information from a warrant application that he does not actually know, even if the reason is his own reckless investigation? The answer is no, which means he is entitled to qualified immunity.

I.

Someone shot a St. Louis fire captain and his passenger...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases