1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 36 F.4th
  5. 36 F.4th 1172 (2022)
 

NEW FORTRESS ENERGY INC. v. FERC

No. 21-1122 Consolidated with 21-1157.

36 F.4th 1172 (2022)

NEW FORTRESS ENERGY INC., Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 14, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shay Dvoretzky argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were John S. Decker , John N. Estes III , William R. Barksdale , Parker A. Rider-Longmaid , and Kyser Blakely .

Robert H. Solomon , Solicitor, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Matthew R. Christiansen , General Counsel, and Robert M. Kennedy , Senior Attorney.

Raghu Murthy was on the brief for amici curiae El Puente de Williamsburg, Inc.-Enlace Latino de Accion Climatica, et al. in support of respondent.

Before: Tatel, Millett, and Pillard, Circuit Judges.

Can a 75-foot pipe be a pipeline? The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission thinks so. Because petitioner has given us no basis to question that judgment, we deny the petitions for review.

I.

The Natural Gas Act (NGA) vests the Commission with broad authority to regulate the transportation and sale of natural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases