BELL v. CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN

No. 21-1516.

37 F.4th 362 (2022)

Gene Raymond BELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN, Defendant, Anthonie Korkis, Arthur Bridgeforth, and Thomas Langewicz, II, jointly and severally and in their individual capacities. Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: June 14, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Kali M. L. Henderson , SEWARD HENDERSON PLLC, Royal Oak, Michigan, for Appellants. Ben M. Gonek , BEN GONEK LAW, P.C., Southgate, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Kali M. L. Henderson , T. Joseph Seward , SEWARD HENDERSON PLLC, Royal Oak, Michigan, for Appellants. Ben M. Gonek , BEN GONEK LAW, P.C., Southgate, Michigan, for Appellee.

Before: WHITE, THAPAR, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

When Gene Bell was pulled over, the police officer asked for his license, registration, and insurance, as officers commonly do. But Bell refused. Instead, he demanded to know why the officer had pulled him over. Yet the officer wanted Bell's information first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases