TURNAGE v. BRITTON

No. 21-60130.

29 F.4th 232 (2022)

Ray C. TURNAGE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Reverend D. Franklin Browne, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Dennis D. Henderson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Carlos Wilson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Fred Burns, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Charles Bartley, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Clarence Magee, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Linda Patrick-Crafton, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Barbara Young, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Juanita J. Griggs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Chernise Seaphus, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated; Mount Carmel Baptist Church; Pinebelt Community Services, Incorporated; Hall-Fairley Mortuary; Deborah Delgado, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sam BRITTON, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner; Cecil Brown, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner; Brandon Presley, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner; Mississippi Power Company, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed March 21, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Daniel O'Donnell, Esq. , Clayton O'Donnell, P.L.L.C., Oxford, MS, Ellis Turnage , Turnage Law Office, Cleveland, MS, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Justin Lee Matheny, Esq. , Office of the Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellees Sam Britton, Cecil Brown, Brandon Presley.

Jonathan Paul Dyal, Esq. , Leo Ernest Manuel , Balch & Bingham, L.L.P., Gulfport, MS, Jason Brent Tompkins , Balch & Bingham, L.L.P., Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee Mississippi Power Company.

Before Dennis, Higginson, and Costa, Circuit Judges.


In 2015, the Supreme Court of Mississippi ordered an electric utility to refund the money it had collected from customers under a faulty rate order. In this federal sequel to that state-court lawsuit, ratepayers contend that an erroneous calculation of the interest on their refunds shorted them millions of dollars in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases