1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 28 F.4th
  5. 28 F.4th 1051 (2022)
 

CHEGUP v. UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF UINTAH AND OURAY

Nos. 19-4178 & 20-4015.

28 F.4th 1051 (2022)

Angelita M. CHEGUP; Tara J. Amboh; Mary Carol Jenkins; Lynda M. Kozlowicz, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF the UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian tribe; The Tribal Business Committee for the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation; Luke Duncan; Tony Small; Shaun Chapoose; Edred Secakuku; Ronald Wopsock; and Sal Wopsock, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

FILED March 18, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ryan Dreveskracht , Galanda Broadman PLLC, Seattle, Washington ( Anthony S. Broadman , Galanda Broadman PLLC, Seattle, Washington, with him on the briefs), for Appellants.

J. Preston Stieff , J. Preston Stieff Law Offices, LLC, Salt Lake City, Utah, for Appellees.

Before HARTZ, Circuit Judge, LUCERO, Senior Circuit Judge, and EID, Circuit Judge.

The Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation ("the Tribe") temporarily banished Angelita M. Chegup, Tara J. Amboh, Mary Carol Jenkins, and Lynda M. Kozlowicz ("the banished members"). The banished members did not challenge their temporary banishment in a tribal forum, but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases