UNITED STATES v. HOBBS

No. 19-4419.

24 F.4th 965 (2022)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Erick Rahumid HOBBS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: February 1, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Joshua Elliott Hoffman , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Brandon Keith Moore , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert K. Hur , United States Attorney, Samika K. Boyd , Assistant United States Attorney, Christine O. Goo , Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge Keenan wrote the opinion, in which Judge King and Judge Wynn joined.


In this appeal, Erick Hobbs primarily challenges the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained after police collected cell phone location data from his cell phone provider without a warrant on the ground of exigent circumstances. The district court concluded that exigent circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases