McKINNEY-DROBNIS v. ORESHACK

No. 20-15539.

16 F.4th 594 (2021)

Baerbel McKINNEY-DROBNIS; Joseph B. Piccola; Camille Berlese, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Kurt ORESHACK, Objector-Appellant, v. Massage Envy, Franchising, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed October 20, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam E. Schulman (argued) and Theodore H. Frank , Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, Center for Class Action Fairness, Washington, D.C., for Objector-Appellant.

Trenton R. Kashima (argued), Sommers Schwartz P.C., San Diego, California; Jeffery R. Krinsk and John J. Nelson , Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP, San Diego, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. (argued), Kahn A. Scolnick , Martie P. Kutscher , and Daniel R. Adler , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, California; Luanne Sacks , Cynthia A. Ricketts , Robert B. Bader , and Mike Scott , Sacks Ricketts & Case LLP, San Francisco, California; for Defendant-Appellee.

Concurrence by Judge Miller.


OPINION

This appeal concerns a district court's approval of a class action settlement that the parties reached before class certification. When a federal court considers whether to approve a settlement, we require the court to closely scrutinize the agreement for any evidence that class counsel's self-interest infected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases