TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS

2020-1852, 2020-1854.

15 F.4th 1121 (2021)

TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP, Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP, Defendants-Appellees Telenav, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: October 12, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Peterson Ramey, III , Ramey & Schwaller, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by John Pierre Lahad , Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, TX.

Brian David Schmalzbach , McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, VA, argued for defendants-appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc. Also represented by David Evan Finkelson ; Tyler Vanhoutan , Houston, TX.

Joshua C. Krumholz , Holland & Knight, LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellee Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP. Also represented by Jacob Kevin Baron ; Kevin Paul Anderson , Duane Morris LLP, Washington, DC.

Before Prost, O'Malley, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.


Traxcell1 sued Sprint2 and Verizon3 for infringement of four patents related to self-optimizing wireless networks and to navigation technology. After claim construction and discovery, the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases