MUJO v. JANI-KING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Docket No. 20-111 August Term, 2020.

13 F.4th 204 (2021)

Simon MUJO and Indrit Muharremi, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JANI-KING INTERNATIONAL, INC., Jani-King Inc., and Jani-King of Hartford, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: September 9, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN ( Richard Hayber , on the brief), Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., Boston, MA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

AARON D. VAN OORT ( Kerry L. Bundy , Larry E. LaTarte , on the brief), Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for defendants-appellees.

JUDGE CALABRESI dissents from the Court's opinion, and files a dissenting opinion.


Defendants-Appellees Jani-King International, Inc., Jani-King, Inc., and Jani-King of Hartford, Inc. ("Jani-King") are franchisors of commercial cleaning services. Jani-King requires its franchisees to pay a fee to acquire a Jani-King franchise. Its customers then pay Jani-King for cleaning services provided by its franchisees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases