ROMERO v. WATKINS AND SHEPARD TRUCKING, INC.

No. 20-55768.

9 F.4th 1097 (2021)

Alejandro ROMERO, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WATKINS AND SHEPARD TRUCKING, INC., a Montana corporation; Schneider National Carriers, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 19, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric A. Panitz (argued), Panitz Law Group APC, Cerritos, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Matthew A. Fitzgerald (argued), McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Matthew C. Kane , Sabrina A. Beldner , and Amy E. Beverlin , McGuireWoods LLP, Los Angeles, California; for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: D. Michael Fisher, Paul J. Watford, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

Plaintiff-appellant Alejandro Romero was laid off by his employer, Watkins & Shepard Trucking. He filed a putative class action suit, claiming Watkins did not give him and other ex-employees advance notice as the federal and California WARN Acts require. Romero, however, had agreed to a binding arbitration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases