PAKDEL v. CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO

No. 17-17504.

5 F.4th 1099 (2021)

Peyman PAKDEL; Sima Chegini, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; San Francisco Board of Supervisors; San Francisco Department of Public Works, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 6, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey W. McCoy , James S. Burling , and Erin E. Wilcox , Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, California; Paul F. Utrecht , Utrecht & Lenvin, LLP, San Francisco, California; Thomas W. Connors , Black McCuskey Souers & Arbaugh, LPA, Canton, Ohio; for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Kristen A. Jensen and Christopher T. Tom , Deputy City Attorneys; Dennis J. Herrera , City Attorney; City Attorney's Office, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco, California; for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Carlos T. Bea, and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The Supreme Court has vacated the previous judgment in this case and remanded the case for further proceedings. Pakdel v. City & County of San Francisco, ___ U.S. ___, 141 S.Ct. 2226, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2021). The Supreme Court also suggested that Plaintiffs' takings theories should be reevaluated in light of its decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, ___ U.S. ___, 141 S.Ct. 2063, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2021...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases