PINNACLE ADVERTISING v. PINNACLE ADVERTISING

No. 19-15167.

7 F.4th 989 (2021)

PINNACLE ADVERTISING AND MARKETING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PINNACLE ADVERTISING AND MARKETING GROUP, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

August 2, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward L. Bishop , Benjamin Adam Campbell , Nicholas S. Lee , Bishop Diehl & Lee, Ltd, Schaumberg, IL, Jon Michael Gibbs , James S. Toscano , Lowndes Drosdick Doster Kantor & Reed, PA, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Joe M. Grant , Adam Marshall , Marshall Grant, PLLC, Thomas G. Zeichman , Counsel, Beighley Myrick Udell & Lynne, PA, Boca Raton, FL, Jennifer L. Mozwecz , Shams Rodriguez & Mozwecz, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.


This appeal arises out of a trademark dispute between two advertising and marketing companies—both of which operate under the name Pinnacle Advertising and Marketing Group. The Illinois-based Pinnacle owns two registered trademarks for the name "Pinnacle" and a stylized version of the word "Pinnacle." It sued the Florida...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases