MOORE v. TRADER JOE'S CO.

No. 19-16618.

4 F.4th 874 (2021)

Lynn MOORE, Shanque King, and Jeffrey Akwei, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TRADER JOE'S COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 15, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. K. Lee (argued), Lee Litigation Group PLLC, New York, New York; David Alan Makman , Law Offices of David A. Makman, Redwood City, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Dawn Sestito (argued) and Collins Kilgore , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Richard K. Eaton, Judge.


OPINION

The parties find themselves in a sticky situation. Trader Joe's Company ("Trader Joe's") markets its store brand Manuka honey as "100% New Zealand Manuka Honey" or "New Zealand Manuka Honey," but Plaintiffs, on behalf of a putative class, claim that because Trader Joe's Manuka Honey actually consists of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases