1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 997 F.3d
  5. 997 F.3d 823 (2021)
 

SCHULTE v. CONOPCO, INC.

No. 20-2696.

997 F.3d 823 (2021)

Karen SCHULTE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CONOPCO, INC., doing business as Unilever, Defendant-Appellee Walgreen Co., Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc.; Walmart, Inc.; Target Corporation; Schnuck Markets, Inc.; Dierbergs Markets, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Does 1-10, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: May 18, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel F. Harvath , HARVATH LAW GROUP, Webster Groves, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

James Patrick Muehlberger , Christopher R. Wray , SHOOK & HARDY, Kansas City, MO, for Defendants-Appellees Conopco, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Schnuck Markets, Inc., and Dierbergs Markets, Inc.

LaDawn L. Burnett , Darci Faulkner Madden , Ann Elizabeth Sternhell Blackwell , BRYAN & CAVE, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendant-Appellee Walmart, Inc.

Troy Bozarth , HEPLER & BROOM, Edwardsville, IL, for Defendant-Appellee Target Corporation.

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Karen Schulte sued numerous companies for violating the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA) through their marketing of men's and women's antiperspirants. §§ 407.010-407.315 RSMo. The district court1 dismissed. Schulte v. Conopco, Inc., 2020 WL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases