COUNTY BD. OF ARLINGTON CTY. v. EXPRESS SCRIPTS

No. 20-1031.

996 F.3d 243 (2021)

The COUNTY BOARD OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EXPRESS SCRIPTS PHARMACY, INC.; ESI Mail Pharmacy Service, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, and Mallinckrodt PLC; Mallinckrodt LLC; SpecGx LLC; Endo Health Solutions Inc.; Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc.; Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; Cephalon, Inc.; Barr Laboratories, Inc.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.; Actavis Pharma, Inc.; Actavis, LLC; Allergan PLC; Allergan Finance, LLC; Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Mylan Institutional Inc.; Indivior Inc.; McKesson Corporation; McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc.; Cardinal Health, Inc.; AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation; General Injectables & Vaccines, Inc.; Insource, Inc.; CVS Health Corporation; CVS Pharmacy, Inc.; CVS TN Distribution, L.L.C.; Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.; Walgreen Co.; Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc.; Express Scripts Holding Company; Express Scripts, Inc.; Caremark Rx, L.L.C.; CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C.; Caremark, L.L.C.; CaremarkPCS, L.L.C.; Unitedhealth Group Incorporated; Optum, Inc.; OptumRx, Inc.; Walmart, Inc.; Rite Aid Corp.; Rite Aid of Virginia, Inc.; Rite Aid Mid-Atlantic; Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc.; Eckerd Corporation; Does 1-100; Henry Schein, Inc., Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: May 3, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Adriana Riviere-Badell , KOBRE & KIM LLP, Miami, Florida, for Appellants. R. Johan Conrod, Jr. , SANFORD HEISLER SHARP, LLP, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Matthew I. Menchel , Miami, Florida, Julian W. Park , KOBRE & KIM LLP, San Francisco, California, for Appellants. Grant Morris , Kevin Sharp , Andrew Miller , SANFORD HEISLER SHARP, LLP, Nashville, Tennessee; Joanne Cicala , THE CICALA LAW FIRM PLLC, Dripping Springs, Texas; W. Edgar Spivey , KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge Quattlebaum wrote the opinion, in which Judge Wilkinson and Judge Niemeyer joined.


This appeal involves the application of 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1)—commonly referred to as the "federal officer removal statute"—to private actors. Under the statute, private actors can remove a case to federal court when they show that they: (1) acted under the direction of a federal officer; (2) possess...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases