PRETERM-CLEVELAND v. McCLOUD

No. 18-3329.

994 F.3d 512 (2021)

PRETERM-CLEVELAND; Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region; Women's Med Group Professional Corporation; Roslyn Kade, M.D.; Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Stephanie McCloud, Director, Ohio Department of Health; Kim G. Rothermel, Secretary, State Medical Board of Ohio; Bruce R. Saferin, Supervising Member, State Medical Board of Ohio, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: April 13, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED EN BANC: Benjamin M. Flowers , OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellants. B. Jessie Hill , ACLU OF OHIO FOUNDATION, INC., Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellees. Alexander V. Maugeri , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae. ON SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF: Benjamin M. Flowers , Stephen P. Carney , Tiffany L. Carwile , OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellants. B. Jessie Hill , Freda J. Levenson , ACLU OF OHIO FOUNDATION, INC., Cleveland, Ohio, Alexa Kolbi-Molinas , AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, New York, New York, Jennifer L. Branch , GERHARDSTEIN & BRANCH CO. LPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellees. Alexander V. Maugeri , Eric S. Dreiband , Thomas E. Chandler , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., Thomas M. Fisher , OFFICE OF THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Indianapolis, Indiana, Chris A. Hollinger , O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, San Francisco, California, Ruth Colker , THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, Columbus, Ohio, Samuel Bagenstos, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Kimberly A. Parker , WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP, Washington, D.C., Devi M. Rao , JENNER & BLOCK LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae.

BATCHELDER, J., delivered the opinion of the court comprising Parts I-IV, V-A, V-C, and VII, in which SUTTON, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, and READLER, JJ., joined, delivered a lead opinion comprising Parts V-B, V-D, and VI in which SUTTON, GRIFFIN, THAPAR, BUSH, and READLER, JJ., joined, and announced the judgment of the court. SUTTON, J. (pp. 535-38), GRIFFIN, J. (pp. 538-40), and BUSH, J. (pp. 540-50), delivered separate concurring opinions. KETHLEDGE, J. (pg. 550), in which LARSEN and NALBANDIAN, JJ., joined, delivered a separate opinion concurring in the opinion of the court and in the judgment. COLE, C.J. (pp. 550-51), in which MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, JJ., joined, MOORE, J. (pp. 551-63), in which COLE, C.J., CLAY, STRANCH, WHITE, and DONALD, JJ., joined, CLAY, J. (pp. 563-68), in which COLE, C.J., MOORE, GIBBONS, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, JJ., joined, GIBBONS, J. (pp. 568-69), in which COLE, C.J., MOORE, CLAY, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, JJ., joined, WHITE, J. (pg. 569), in which COLE, C.J., and STRANCH, J., joined, and DONALD, J. (pp. 569-91), in which COLE, C.J., MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, WHITE, and STRANCH, JJ., joined, delivered separate dissenting opinions.


OPINION

This is an appeal from a district court order granting a preliminary injunction based on the plaintiffs' claim that an Ohio law, referred to herein as H.B. 214, is facially unconstitutional and, therefore, unenforceable in any respect. Because we conclude that the plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases