LYNGAAS v. AG

Nos. 20-1199/1200/1243.

992 F.3d 412 (2021)

Brian LYNGAAS, D.D.S., individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant (20-1199/20-1200), Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee (20-1200/20-1243), v. Curaden AG, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant (20-1200/20-1243), Curaden USA, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee (20-1199/20-1200).

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: March 24, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Brian S. Sullivan , DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Curaden AG and Curaden USA, Incorporated. David M. Oppenheim , BOCK, HATCH, LEWIS & OPPENHEIM, LLC, Chicago, Illinois, for Brian Lyngaas, D.D.S. ON BRIEF: Brian S. Sullivan , DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Curaden AG and Curaden USA, Incorporated. David M. Oppenheim , Phillip A. Bock , BOCK, HATCH, LEWIS & OPPENHEIM, LLC, Chicago, Illinois, for Brian Lyngaas, D.D.S.

Before: CLAY, GILMAN, and THAPAR, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

This case involves two unsolicited fax advertisements received by Brian Lyngaas, D.D.S., in March 2016. Lyngaas asserts, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated class members, that Curaden AG and its U.S. subsidiary, Curaden USA, violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases