1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 991 F.3d
  5. 991 F.3d 155 (2021)
 

CHO v. BLACKBERRY LTD.

Docket No. 19-3376-cv August Term, 2020.

991 F.3d 155 (2021)

Yong M. CHO, Batuhan Ulug, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Marvin Pearlstein, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Todd Cox, Mary Dinzik, Plaintiffs, v. BLACKBERRY LIMITED, fka Research in Motion Limited, Thorsten Heins, Brian Bidulka, Steve Zipperstein, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: March 11, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A.P. Brower , Brower Piven, A Professional Corp., New York, NY ( Kim E. Miller , J. Ryan Lopatka , Kahn Swick & Foti, New York, NY, on the brief), for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Joseph R. Palmore , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC ( Dan Marmalefsky , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles, CA, James J. Beha II , Lena H. Hughes , Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY on the brief), for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: Livingston, Chief Judge, Cabranes and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Yong M. Cho and Batuhan Ulug, individual named plaintiffs in a putative securities class action, appeal a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Colleen McMahon, C.J.) granting judgment on the pleadings and dismissing

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases