SMITH v. RECORDQUEST, LLC

No. 19-2084.

989 F.3d 513 (2021)

Daphne SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RECORDQUEST, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided February 26, 2021.

Rehearing Denied March 17, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott C. Borison , Attorney, Borison Firm LLC, San Mateo, CA, Robert J. Welcenbach , Attorney, Welcenbach Law Offices, Milwaukee, WI for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mark Mao , Attorney, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, San Francisco, CA, Timothy Allen Butler , Attorney, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Ronald I. Raether, Jr. , Attorney, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Irvine, CA, Daniel Robert Waltz , Attorney, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, for Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before Flaum, Brennan, and Scudder, Circuit Judges.


Federal courts defer to state courts on state-law issues, but not without reservation. In this case, Daphne Smith claimed RecordQuest, LLC charged excessive fees when satisfying her request for health records. So Smith sued, alleging violation of Wisconsin's health records statute and unjust enrichment. The district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases