1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 987 F.3d
  5. 987 F.3d 556 (2021)
 

GRIFFITH v. COM'R OF SOCIAL SEC.

Nos. 19-6395 et al.

987 F.3d 556 (2021)

Carolyn GRIFFITH (19-6395); Timothy Howard (19-6396); Robert Martin (19-6397); Patricia Lane Richards (19-6398); Regina Reed (19-6399); Ross Clayton Fleming (19-6400); Teresa Akers (19-6401); Stephen Kidd (19-6402); Elizabeth Wright (19-6403); Margie Lewis (19-6412); Tommy Maynard (19-6413); Lana Gresham (19-6414); Rodney Justice (19-6415); Marsha F. Kidd (19-6419); Benny Cole (19-6422); Michael Cline (19-6432); Gregory Salisbury (19-6433); Eddie Reed (19-6438); Margaret Copley (19-6439); Ranie Coleman (19-6440); Janie Shepherd (19-6441); Lenny Newsome (19-6442); Janice Workman (19-6443); Joann Holbrook (19-6444); Betty Robinson (19-6445); Kathy Ramey (19-6446); Carolyn Bates (19-6452); Kathleen Campbell Curtis (19-6453); Chad Shepherd (19-6472); Danny Reed (19-6473); Tracy Hannah (19-6474); Martin Gillespie (19-6487); Chessie Gray (19-6488); Clinton Mullins (19-6489); Robert Muncy II (19-6490); Mary Sexton (19-6491); Brenda Stewart (19-6492); John Perkins (20-5057); Edd Paige (20-5058); Michelle Maynard (20-5059); Danny Johnson (20-5060); James Taylor (20-5061); Terry Shepherd (20-5062); Janet Faye Skaggs (20-5063); Patricia Gay LeMaster (20-5064); Marcia Kay Hylton (20-5065); Jimmy Kilgore (20-5066); Teresa Hinkle-Spears (20-5067); Tammy Slone (20-5078); Cora Neace Russelburg (20-5079); Sherri Lynn Combs (20-5080); Martha Neace (20-5106); Elizabeth Ann White (20-5107); Donna Jewell (20-5108); Peggy Wolford (20-5109); Sharon Thompson (20-5146); Dale Wireman (20-5159), Plaintiffs-appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: February 3, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Amy Lishinski , WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Jaynie Lilley , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Amy Lishinski , Daniel S. Volchok , Arpit K. Garg , WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP, Washington, D.C., Evan B. Smith , APPALRED LEGAL AID, Prestonsburg, Kentucky, Wolodymyr Cybriwski , Prestonsburg, Kentucky, Derek D. Humfleet , RADEN HUMFLEET LAW, PLC, Lexington, Kentucky, George Piemonte , MARTIN, JONES & PIEMONTE, Decatur, Georgia, Ned Pillersdorf , PILLERSDORF, DEROSSETT & LANE, Prestonsburg, Kentucky, for Appellants. Jaynie Lilley , Charles Scarborough , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

GIBBONS, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which ROGERS, J., joined. MOORE, J. (pp. 574-77), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

OPINION

In Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security, a majority of this panel concluded that the government's process for redetermining plaintiffs' eligibility for social security benefits was constitutionally and statutorily deficient. 909 F.3d 786, 791-92 (6th...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases