1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 982 F.3d
  5. 982 F.3d 412 (2020)
 

UNITED STATES v. MILLER

No. 18-5578.

982 F.3d 412 (2020)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William J. MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: December 3, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Eric G. Eckes , PINALES, STACHLER, YOUNG, BURRELL & CROUSE CO., L.P.A., Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Elaine K. Leonhard , UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Ft. Mitchell, Kentucky, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Eric G. Eckes , PINALES, STACHLER, YOUNG, BURRELL & CROUSE CO., L.P.A., Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Elaine K. Leonhard , UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Ft. Mitchell, Kentucky, Charles P. Wisdom, Jr. , UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellee. Alan Butler , ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, Washington, D.C., Ryan T. Mrazik , PERKINS COIE LLP, Seattle, Washington, for Amici Curiae.

Before: McKEAGUE, KETHLEDGE, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

Courts often must apply the legal rules arising from fixed constitutional rights to new technologies in an evolving world. The First Amendment's rules for speech apply to debate on the internet. Packingham v. North Carolina, ___ U.S. ___, 137 S.Ct. 1730, 1735-36, 198...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases