BLISS v. CORECIVIC, INC.

No. 19-16167.

978 F.3d 1144 (2020)

Kathleen BLISS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORECIVIC, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed October 27, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anna P. Prakash (argued), Matthew H. Morgan , and Charles A. Delbridge , Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Paul S. Padda and Joshua Y. Ang , Paul Padda Law, PLLC, Las Vegas, Nevada; for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Nicholas D. Acedo (argued), Daniel P. Struck , and Kevin L. Nguyen , Struck Love Bojanowski & Acedo, PLC, Chandler, Arizona; for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: Eric D. Miller and Danielle J. Hunsaker, Circuit Judges, and Patrick J. Schiltz, District Judge.


OPINION

Criminal defense attorney Kathleen Bliss sued CoreCivic, Inc. under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2523, and Nevada's wiretap act, Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 200.610-200.690 (collectively

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases