1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. REALTIME DATA LLC v. REDUXIO SYSTEMS, INC.
 

REALTIME DATA LLC v. REDUXIO SYSTEMS, INC.

Nos. 2019-2198, 2019-2201, 2019-2202, 2019-2204.

REALTIME DATA LLC, DBA IXO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REDUXIO SYSTEMS, INC., ARYAKA NETWORKS, INC., PANZURA, INC., FORTINET, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: October 23, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

BRIAN DAVID LEDAHL , Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MARC AARON FENSTER , PAUL ANTHONY KROEGER , REZA MIRZAIE .

JOHN NEUKOM , Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendant-appellee Fortinet, Inc. also represented by MICHELLE KAO , JAMES Y. PAK .

GUY YONAY , Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz LLP, New York, NY, for defendant-appellee Reduxio Systems, Inc.

JOSHUA M. MASUR , Zuber Lawler & Del Duca LLP, Redwood City, CA, for defendant-appellee Aryaka Networks, Inc.

BRIAN E. MITCHELL , Mitchell & Company, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee Panzura, Inc.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge TARANTO.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

In 1955, Judge Learned Hand called the court-created "invention requirement" "the most baffling concept" in all of patent law. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co., 224 F.2d 530, 536 (2d Cir. 1955).1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases