U.S. v. HAMED

No. 19-1184.

976 F.3d 825 (2020)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mubarak Ahmed HAMED, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: October 5, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James O. Hacking, III , Hacking Law Practice LLC, St. Louis, MO, argued ( Amany Ragab Hacking , on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Christopher W. Hollis , U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Dist. Ct. Section, Washington, DC, argued ( Joseph H. Hunt , Asst. Atty., Gen., Civil Div., William C. Peachy , Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, Dist. Ct. Section, Kathleen A. Connolly , Deputy Chief, National Security & Affirmative Litigation Unit, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SMITH, Chief Judge, COLLOTON and STRAS, Circuit Judges.


This case requires us to determine what effect, if any, a guilty plea has on later denaturalization proceedings. In this case, the district court1 ruled that Hamed was collaterally estopped from taking a position that was inconsistent with what he said when he pleaded guilty. Although we conclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases