U.S. v. CANO

No. 17-50151.

973 F.3d 966 (2020)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel Angel CANO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed September 2, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harini P. Raghupathi , Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant.

Mark R. Rehe and Peter Ko , Assistant United States Attorneys; Daniel E. Zipp , Chief, Appellate Section, Criminal Division; Robert S. Brewer Jr. , United States Attorney; United States Attorney's Office, San Diego, California; for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Sophia Cope and Adam Schwartz , Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, California, for Amicus Curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Dissent by Judge Bennett.


ORDER

The panel judges have voted to deny Plaintiff-Appellee's petition for rehearing. Judge Graber voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Bybee and Harpool recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases