1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 971 F.3d
  5. 971 F.3d 1088 (2020)
 

NAMISNAK v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 18-15860.

971 F.3d 1088 (2020)

Stephan NAMISNAK; Francis Falls, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; Rasier, LLC, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 24, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bryan Killian (argued) and Stephanie Schuster , Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, D.C.; Anne Marie Estevez , Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Miami, Florida; for Defendants-Appellants.

Karla Gilbride (argued), Public Justice P.C., Washington, D.C.; Garret DeReus , Bizer & Dereus LLC, New Orleans, Louisiana; William Most , Aqua Terra Aeris Law Group, Albany, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Opinion by Judge R. Nelson.

OPINION

Plaintiffs Stephen Namisnak and Francis Falls ("Plaintiffs") sued Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") for not providing a wheelchair-accessible ride-sharing option in their hometown of New Orleans. But they never downloaded the Uber App—and therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases