1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 967 F.3d
  5. 967 F.3d 1353 (2020)
 

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC. v. 10X GENOMICS INC.

2019-2255, 2019-2285.

967 F.3d 1353 (2020)

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC., The University of Chicago, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. 10X GENOMICS INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: August 3, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Reines , Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by Christopher Shawn Lavin , Derek C. Walter .

E. Joshua Rosenkranz , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by Elizabeth Moulton , Menlo Park, CA; Melanie L. Bostwick , Washington, DC; Azra Hadzimehmedovic , Tensegrity Law Group LLP, McLean, VA; Matthew D. Powers , Robert Lewis Gerrity , Redwood Shores, CA.

Steven R. Trybus , Locke Lord LLP, Chicago, IL, for amicus curiae The Broad Institute, Inc.

Before Newman, O'Malley, and Taranto, Circuit Judges.

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. and the University of Chicago (collectively, "Bio-Rad"), accused 10X Genomics Inc. ("10X") of infringing three patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 8,889,083 ("'083 patent"); 8,304,193 ("'193 patent"); and 8,329,407 ("'407 patent"). The United States District Court for the District of Delaware held a jury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases