967 F.3d 1319 (2020)

ILLUMINA, INC., Sequenom, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc., Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Opinion Modified: August 3, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Reines , Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by Christopher Shawn Lavin , Derek C. Walter ; Zachary Tripp , Washington, DC.

Daralyn Jeannine Durie , Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendant-appellee Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. also represented by David Floyd McGowan , Laura Miller .

Robert J. Gunther, Jr. , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY, for defendants-appellees Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc., Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Also represented by Omar Khan , Christopher R. Noyes ; Thomas Saunders , Washington, DC.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.

Illumina, Inc. and Sequenom, Inc. (collectively, "Illumina") appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that claims 1-2, 4-5, and 9-10 of U.S. Patent 9,580,751 (the "'751 patent") and claims 1-2 and 10-14 of U.S. Patent 9,738,931 (the "'931 patent") are invalid under...

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases