ASHKER v. NEWSOM

Nos. 19-15224 19-15359.

968 F.3d 975 (2020)

Todd Lewis ASHKER; Danny Troxell; George Ruiz; Jeffrey Anthony Franklin; George Franco; Gabriel Ralph Reyes; Richard K. Johnson; Paul A. Redd, Jr.; Luis Esquivel; Ronnie N. Dewberry, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Gavin NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California; Matthew Cate; Anthony Chaus, Chief, Office of Correctional Safety, CDCR; Greg Lewis, Warden, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 3, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey T. Fisher (argued), Deputy Attorney General; Adriano Hrvatin and Neah Huynh , Supervising Attorneys General; Monica N. Anderson , Attorney General; Xavier Becerra , Attorney General; Office of the Attorney General, San Francisco, California; for Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Jules Lobel (argued), Rachel Meeropol , and Samuel Miller , Center for Constitutional Rights, New York, New York; Carmen E. Bremer , Bremer Law Group PLLC, Seattle, Washington; Anne Cappella , Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, California; Charles F.A. Carbone , Law Offices of Charles Carbone, San Francisco, California; Anne Butterfield Weills , Siegel Yee & Brunner, Oakland, California; Matthew Strugar , Law Office of Matthew Strugar, Los Angeles, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

Paula Mitchell , The Project for the Innocent at Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, California; Alexis Agathocleous , The Innocence Project Inc., New York, New York; Linda Starr , The Northern California Innocence Project, Santa Clara, California; Alexander Simpson , The California Innocence Project, San Diego, California;

Donald Specter , Margot Mendelson , and Patrick Booth , Prison Law Office, Berkeley, California, for Amici Curiae Former Corrections Officials.

Before: J. Clifford Wallace and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges, and James S. Gwin, District Judge.


OPINION

This appeal and cross-appeal arise from the magistrate judge's order extending the supervision of the case based on alleged due process violations.1 Because the magistrate judge lacked authority to enter the final extension order, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases