Tamara MOORE; Greta L. Ervin; Raff Arando; Nichols Smith; Renee Edgren; Cynthia Welton, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MARS PETCARE US, INC.; Nestle Purina Petcare Company; Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.; Petsmart, Inc.; Medical Management International, Inc., dba Banfield Pet Hospital; Bluepearl Vet, LLC; Royal Canin USA Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted July 19, 2019 San Francisco, California.
This appeal arises out of a challenge by Tamara Moore and five other California residents (collectively "Plaintiffs") to the marketing of so-called prescription pet food under California's consumer protection laws and federal antitrust law.1 Plaintiffs brought a putative class action...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.