Yassir FAZAGA; Ali Uddin Malik; Yasser Abdelrahim, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; Christopher A. Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity; Paul Delacourt, Assistant Director in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation's Los Angeles Division, in his official capacity; Pat Rose; Kevin Armstrong; Paul Allen, Defendants, and
Barbara Walls; J. Stephen Tidwell, Defendants-Appellants.
Yassir Fazaga; Ali Uddin Malik; Yasser Abdelrahim, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Federal Bureau of Investigation; Christopher A. Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity; Paul Delacourt, Assistant Director in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation's Los Angeles Division, in his official capacity; J. Stephen Tidwell; Barbara Walls, Defendants, and
Pat Rose; Kevin Armstrong; Paul Allen, Defendants-Appellants.
Yassir Fazaga; Ali Uddin Malik; Yasser Abdelrahim, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Federal Bureau of Investigation; Christopher A. Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity; Paul Delacourt, Assistant Director in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation's Los Angeles Division, in his official capacity; J. Stephen Tidwell; Barbara Walls; Pat Rose; Kevin Armstrong; Paul Allen; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted December 7, 2015 Pasadena, California.
Amended February 28, 2019.
Filed July 20, 2020.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Carl J. Nichols (argued) and Howard M. Shapiro , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, D.C.; Katie Moran , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Los Angeles, California; for Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees Barbara Walls and J. Stephen Tidwell.
Concurrence in Order by Judges Gould and Berzon; Statement by Judge Steeh; Dissent to Order by Judge Bumatay.
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed on February 28, 2019, reported at 916 F.3d 1202, is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellees' petition for rehearing. Judges Berzon and Gould have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Steeh so recommends.
The full court has been advised...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
