1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 964 F.3d
  5. 964 F.3d 1112 (2020)
 

FITBIT, INC. v. VALENCELL, INC.

2019-1048.

964 F.3d 1112 (2020)

FITBIT, INC., Appellant, v. VALENCELL, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: July 8, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin P.B. Johnson , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Mark Yeh-Kai Tung ; Sam Stephen Stake , Ognjen Zivojnovic, San Francisco, CA; Harper Batts , Christopher Scott Ponder , Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Palo Alto, CA.

Jeffrey Bragalone , Bragalone Conroy PC, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by Thomas William Kennedy, Jr. , Justin Kimble , Daniel Fletcher Olejko , Jonathan H. Rastegar .

Before Newman, Dyk, and Reyna, Circuit Judges.

Fitbit, Inc. appeals the Final Written Decision of the United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB" or "Board"),1 concerning the inter partes review ("IPR") of United States Patent No. 8,923,941 ("the '941 patent") owned by Valencell, Inc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases