1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 964 F.3d
  5. 964 F.3d 239 (2020)
 

FRY v. RAND CONST. CORP.

No. 18-2083.

964 F.3d 239 (2020)

Arlene FRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: July 1, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Adam Augustine Carter , EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. James Edward Tysse , AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Jeanne Louise Heiser , R. Scott Oswald , Nicholas Woodfield , EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Anthony T. Pierce , Nathan J. Oleson , Lide E. Paterno , Erica E. Holland , AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Richardson wrote the opinion, in which Judge Niemeyer joined. Judge Motz wrote a dissenting opinion.

Arlene Fry alleges her former employer, Rand Construction Corporation, unlawfully fired her for taking leave under the Family Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"). A jury agreed and returned a verdict in Fry's favor. Yet the district court entered judgment for Rand. Fry, according to the district court, failed to present sufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases