1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 955 F.3d
  5. 955 F.3d 16 (2020)
 

TECHNICAL CONSUMER PROD. v. LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP

2019-1361.

955 F.3d 16 (2020)

TECHNICAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC., Nicor, Inc., Amax Lighting, Appellants, v. LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: April 8, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stacie Rachel Hartman , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellants. Also represented by John Lloyd Abramic , Katherine H. Johnson .

Kayvan B. Noroozi , Noroozi PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee.

Before Dyk, Chen, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.

Technical Consumer Products, Inc., Nicor, Inc., and Amax Lighting (collectively, "TCP") petitioned for inter partes review of several claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,201,968. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board determined that TCP did not demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 1-4, 6, 14, and 15 of the '968 patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases