1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 952 F.3d
  5. 952 F.3d 1157 (2020)
 

PAKDEL v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

No. 17-17504.

952 F.3d 1157 (2020)

Peyman PAKDEL; Sima Chegini, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; San Francisco Board Of Supervisors; San Francisco Department Of Public Works, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed March 17, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey W. McCoy (argued), James S. Burling , and Erin E. Wilcox , Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, California; Paul F. Utrecht , Utrecht & Lenvin, LLP, San Francisco, California; Thomas W. Connors , Black McCuskey Souers & Arbaugh, LPA, Canton, Ohio; for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Kristen A. Jensen (argued) and Christopher T. Tom , Deputy City Attorneys; Dennis J. Herrera , City Attorney; City Attorney's Office, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco, California; for Defendants-Appellees.

Dissent by Judge Bea

OPINION

In the City and County of San Francisco (the "City"), ownership of multi-unit buildings is often shared by different people through a form of property ownership known as a tenancy in common. For years, those in the City who sought to convert their tenancy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases