1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 950 F.3d
  5. 950 F.3d 860 (2020)
 

ARCTIC CAT v. BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS

2019-1080.

950 F.3d 860 (2020)

ARCTIC CAT INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS INC., BRP U.S. Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: February 19, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregg Locascio , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Nathan S. Mammen , John C. O'Quinn , Calvin Alexander Shank ; Nicholas Stephan Boebel , Hansen Reynolds LLC, Minneapolis, MN; Niall Andrew MacLeod , Aaron Myers , Diane Peterson, Kutak Rock LLP, Minneapolis, MN.

Louis W. Tompros , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Jennifer Jasmine John , Michelle Liszt Sandals .

Before Lourie, Moore, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.

Arctic Cat Inc. ("Arctic Cat") appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida that Arctic Cat is not entitled to recover pre-complaint damages from Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. ("Bombardier") due to the failure of Arctic Cat's licensee to mark products in accordance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases