JOHNSON v. SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI

No. 18-2423.

949 F.3d 791 (2020)

Arthur JOHNSON, Appellant, v. SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Opinion Filed: February 7, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig M. Cooley [ARGUED], COOLEY LAW OFFICE, 1308 Plumdale Court, Pittsburgh, PA 15239, Counsel for Appellant.

Jennifer O. Andress [ARGUED], Assistant District Attorney, Max C. Kaufman , Supervisor, Federal Litigation, Nancy Winkelman , Supervisor, Law Division, Lawrence S. Krasner , District Attorney, 3 South Penn Square, Philadelphia, PA 19107, Counsel for Appellee.

Before: KRAUSE, MATEY, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

Although we generally rely on jurors to follow a court's instructions, we cannot expect the superhuman from them. Under certain circumstances, jurors cannot practically be expected to follow instructions, no matter how clear or explicit. The classic example arises during a joint criminal trial, in which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases