1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 948 F.3d
  5. 948 F.3d 376 (2020)
 

LOUMIET v. U.S.

No. 18-5020.

948 F.3d 376 (2020)

Carlos LOUMIET, Esquire, Appellee v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Michael Rardin, et al., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided January 28, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tyce R. Walters , Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Jessie K. Liu , U.S. Attorney, and Mark B. Stern , Attorney.

Carlos Loumiet, pro se, argued the cause for appellee. On the brief was Andrés Rivero.

Before: Garland, Chief Judge, Katsas, Circuit Judge, and Williams, Senior Circuit Judge.

In Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment creates an implied damages action for unconstitutional searches against line officers enforcing

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases