Gabriel Felix MORAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The SCREENING PROS, LLC, a California corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted August 23, 2018 Pasadena, California.
Filed May 14, 2019.
Amended November 21, 2019.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Deepak Gupta and Peter Conti-Brown , Gupta Beck PLLC, Washington D.C.; Meredith Desautels , Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, San Francisco, California; Joshua E. Kim , A New Way of Life Reentry Project, Los Angeles, California; Devin H. Fok , Law Offices of Devin H. Fok, Alhambra, California; Craig Davis , Law Offices of Craig Davis, San Francisco, California; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Alison S. Hightower and Rod M. Fliegel , Littler Mendelson P.C., San Francisco, California, for Amicus Curiae National Multifamily Resident Information Council.
Tanya Koshy , East Bay Community Law Center, Berkeley, California, for Amici Curiae East Bay Community Law Center; Asian Americans Advancing Justice — Asian Law Caucus; American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California; Bay Area Legal Aid; The California Reinvestment Coalition; The Center for Employment Opportunities; Drug Policy Alliance; Ella Baker Center; The University of California Hastings Civil Justice Clinic; Housing and Economic Rights Advocates; Legal Action Center; Legal Services for Prisoners with Children; The National Consumer Law Center; The National Employment Law Project; The National Housing Law Project; Public Good; Rubicon Programs; and Safer Foundation.
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Kleinfeld
ORDER
The opinion filed on May 14, 2019, is amended by the opinion and dissent filed concurrently with this order. The amendment to the opinion is as follows:
1. On page 1185 of the slip opinion, the second full paragraph, replace:
For the cited reasons, we hold that the seven-year reporting window for a criminal charge begins on the date of entry. We additionally hold that the dismissal of a charge does not constitute an adverse item and may not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.