ARTHREX, INC. v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.

2018-2140.

941 F.3d 1320 (2019)

ARTHREX, INC., Appellant, v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Arthrocare Corp., Appellees. United States, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: October 31, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony P. Cho , Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, PC, Birmingham, MI, argued for appellant. Also represented by David Louis Atallah , David J. Gaskey , Jessicae Zilberberg .

Charles T. Steenburg , Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Also represented by Richard Giunta , Turhan Sarwar ; Michael N. Rader , New York, NY.

Melissa N. Patterson , Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by Courtney Dixon , Scott R. McIntosh , Joseph H. Hunt ; Sarah E. Craven , Thomas W. Krause , Joseph Matal , Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.

Before Moore, Reyna, and Chen, Circuit Judges.


Arthrex, Inc. appeals from the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board holding claims 1, 4, 8, 10-12, 16, 18, and 25-28 of U.S. Patent No. 9,179, 907 unpatentable as anticipated. Arthrex appeals this decision and contends that the appointment of the Board's Administrative Patent Judges ("APJs") by the Secretary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases