MING DAI v. BARR

No. 15-70776.

940 F.3d 1143 (2019)

MING DAI, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed October 22, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Z. Su , Law Offices of David Z. Su, West Covina, California; David J. Zimmer , Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, Massachusetts; William M. Jay , Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, D.C.; for Petitioner.

Aimee J. Carmichael , Senior Litigation Counsel; Mary Jane Candaux and John W. Blakeley , Assistant Directors; Donald Keener , Deputy Director; Office of Immigration, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; for Respondent.

Order; Statement Respecting Denial by Judge Trott; Dissent by Judge Callahan; Statement Respecting Denial by Judges O'Scannlain and Trott; Dissent by Judge Collins.


ORDER

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed R. App. P. 35. Judge Miller was recused and did not participate in the vote.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. Attached are dissents from and statements respecting the denial of rehearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases