1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 940 F.3d
  5. 940 F.3d 205 (2019)
 

BISIG v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.

Nos. 18-5421/5483.

940 F.3d 205 (2019)

Kenneth BISIG, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: October 4, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Victor B. Maddox , FULTZ MADDOX DICKENS PLC, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. C. Celeste Creswell , KABAT CHAPMAN & OZMER LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant. ON BRIEF: Victor B. Maddox, FULTZ MADDOX DICKENS PLC, Louisville, Kentucky, Mary E. Eade , NEMES EADE PLLC, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. C. Celeste Creswell, Joseph W. Ozmer II , KABAT CHAPMAN & OZMER LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, Todd B. Logsdon , Megan R. U'Sellis , Raymond C. Haley , FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Before: MERRITT, GIBBONS, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

This case is about promises made, promises broken, and disclaimers signed. And it is a reminder that not every broken promise occasions a legal remedy.

Plaintiffs1 sued Time Warner after it allegedly failed to make good on oral promises of continued employment and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases