SIPCO, LLC v. EMERSON ELEC. CO.

2018-1635.

939 F.3d 1301 (2019)

SIPCO, LLC, Appellant v. EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 25, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Barney , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Kelly Lu ; Gregory J. Gonsalves , Gonsalves Law Firm, Falls Church, VA.

Douglas Hallward-Driemeier , Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by James Richard Batchelder , James Lawrence Davis, Jr. , East Palo Alto, CA.

Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge Reyna.


SIPCO, LLC (SIPCO) appeals a final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) in a covered business method (CBM) review of its U.S. Patent No. 8,908,842 ('842 patent). After instituting CBM review, the Board found claims 1, 7, 9, 16, and 17 of the '842 patent ineligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases