1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 936 F.3d
  5. 936 F.3d 937 (2019)
 

JESSOP v. CITY OF FRESNO

No. 17-16756.

936 F.3d 937 (2019)

Micah JESSOP; Brittan Ashjian, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF FRESNO; Derik Kumagai; Curt Chastain; Tomas Cantu, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed September 4, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin G. Little, Esquire , Law Office of Kevin G. Little, Fresno, California; Neal K. Katyal , Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak , and Mitchell P. Reich , Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C.; for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Daniel P. Barer , Pollak Vida & Barer, Los Angeles, California; Peter J. Ferguson and Allen Christiansen , Ferguson Praet & Sherman APC, Santa Ana, California; Kevin M. Osterberg , Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP, Riverside, California; for Defendants-Appellees.

Jessica Ring Amunson and Andrew C. Noll , Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae The DKT Liberty Project, Reason Foundation, Individual Rights Foundation, Public Justice, National Police Accountability Project, Law Enforcement Action Partnership, Institute for Justice, and Americans for Prosperity.

Clark M. Neily III and Jay R. Schweikert , Washington, D.C., as and for Amicus Curiae The Cato Institute.

C. Mitchell Hendy , Mayer Brown LLP, Los Angeles, California; Donald M. Falk , Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, California; for Amici Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, and American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.

Mahesha P. Subbaraman , Subbaraman PLLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Amici Curiae Restore the Fourth, Inc. and Americans for Forfeiture Reform.

Jonathan F. Mitchell , Mitchell Law PLLC, Austin, Texas; Mark Chenoweth , Michael P. DeGrandis , and Caleb Kruckenberg , New Civil Liberties Alliance; for Amicus Curiae New Civil Liberties Alliance.

Concurrence by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.

ORDER

The prior opinion in this case, found at Jessop v. City of Fresno, 918 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2019), is hereby withdrawn. A superseding opinion will be filed concurrently with this order. Plaintiffs-Appellants' petition for rehearing en banc remains pending.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases