EHRMAN v. COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

No. 19-55658.

932 F.3d 1223 (2019)

David EHRMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; COXCOM, LLC; Cox Communications California, LLC, and Does, 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 8, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katherine Tracy Van Dusen (argued), Richard R. Patch , Scott C. Hall , and Philip D.W. Miller , Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendants-Appellants.

Jamin S. Soderstrom (argued), Soderstrom Law PC, Irvine, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.


OPINION

When a defendant removes a case to federal court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), how much evidence of the parties' citizenships must it provide? If the defendant's citizenship allegations are unchallenged factually, the answer is none. In such cases, all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases